Thursday, November 26, 2009
Natural Gas – U-Turn Follow-up
The writer elaborated on his thoughts about the trend for Natural Gas in a previous article for Seeking Alpha posted November 23, 2009. The volume of interest and comments that this article generated surprised the writer. It appears that natural gas is a very hot topic and that there is no shortage of opinions about which direction natural gas will take from here. Also the Horizons Beta Pro Nymex Natural Gas Bull ETF (HNU:ca) appears to be a hot search topic on Stockcharts.com as depicted on a snapshot of the search cloud below.
Figure 1: Search Cloud for Stockcharts on Nov 25. Interest in HNU ETF was extremely high.
If the market participant was bullish about the natural gas price prospects, the double leveraged HNU ETF would be one of the choices available.
As chance would have it, Tuesday November 24th, 2009 was a hot day for the markets generally and for natural gas in particular. See the three charts below depicting the daily, weekly and the point and figure aspects for NYMEX Natural Gas Futures.
Daily View
Figure 2: Natural Gas Futures at NYMEX. Note the bottom set on September 4th, 2009. A gain of 6% was registered on November 25th, 2009.
Weekly View
Figure 3: Natural Gas Futures at NYMEX in a weekly view.
Point & Figure View
Figure 4: Point and Figure Chart for Natural Gas Futures. Note the target objective of $11.25.
Natural Gas gained 6% for the day while the HNU ETF gained a remarkable 15%. The last chart gives the writer the most telling information. The algorithms are predicting a target price for Natural Gas of $11.25. It appears the bottom set in early September is still valid, and until the trend upwards is invalidated sufficiently, the price target is still standing.
What should one make of this? There are many opinions as to the sagging state of natural gas pricing; the low prices are caused by the surplus supplies, spanking new shale gas finds, the sagging financial systems or a combination of all three. For the writer, he believes all this information is already priced in, and the market is looking forward, as always. For all the criticism of the market being irrational, the market is the great dispassionate assembler of all known information and spits it out for a bottom line in the price. The point and figure chart has already dispassionately spitted out a target price of $11.25. The writer will stay and enjoy the ride.
Disclosure: The writer holds a long position in HNU.
Marco G. November 26, 2009 goombarhsedge.blogspot.com/
Important Disclosure
The information and opinions contained within this document reflect the personal opinions and views of the author and should be view as information for thought and entertainment only. The author may from time to time have a position in any of the securities mentioned. Any material within should not be construed as accurate or reliable or be utilized as advice for investment or business purposes. Independent due diligence and discussions with one’s own investment and business advisor is strongly recommended. There are no guarantees of the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. These writing are not to be construed as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or as an endorsement of any product or service. We do not receive or request compensation in any form in order to feature companies in this publication. It is prohibited to copy or redistribute this document to any type of third party without the express permission of the author. This document may be quoted, in context, provided proper credit is given.
Monday, November 23, 2009
GBG –Prime Gold Acquisition Candidate
Introduction
This is the second part of a two part article on Gold mining acquisition. In the first part, we explored some ideas of Gold production and the replacement of reserve ounces that were mined. For the large capital gold stocks (referred to as “Big Gold”), the most viable route is the acquisition of Gold Juniors to replenish their gold ore reserves. In this concluding part, we will examine a Great Basin Gold as a prime candidate for acquisition.
Prime Acquisition Candidates
Following is a compiled list of Emerging Gold Producers circa 2007, from the Gold Stock Strategist website. These soon to be producers are the most viable and least risky candidates for Big Gold to acquire.
Emerging Gold Producers
1. Alexis Minerals Corp. (TSX:AMC; OTC:AMSMF)
2. Anatolia Minerals Development Ltd. (OTC:ALIAF)
3. Apollo Gold Corp. (TSX:ATG: AMEX:AGT)
4. Atna Resources Ltd. (TSX:ATN; OTC:ATNAF)
5. ATW Venture Corp. (TSX:ATW: OTC:ATWVF)
6. Aurelian Resources (TSX:ARU, OTC:AUREF)
7. Aurizon (TSX:ARZ; AMEX:AZK)
8. Axmin Inc. (TSX:AXM; OTC:AXMIF)
9. CGA Mining Ltd. (TSX:CGA; OTC:CGAFF)
10. Crystallex International Corp.(TSX:KRY; AMEX:KRY)
11. Dynasty Metals & Mining Inc. (TSX:DMM; OTC:DMMIF)
12. European Goldfields Ltd.(TSX:EGU)
13. European Minerals, Inc.(TSX:EPM; OTC:EPMCF)
14. Gabriel Resources Ltd. (TSX:GBU; OTC:GBRRF)
15. Jaguar Mining, Inc. (TSX:JAG; NYSE:JAG)
16. Gold Reserve Inc. (TSX:GRZ; AMEX:GRZ)
17. Gold-Ore Resources Ltd. (TSX:GOZ; OTC:GREXF)
18. Gold Resource Corp.(OTC: GORO)
19. Golden Queen Mining Comp. (TSX:GQM; OTC:GQMNF)
20. Great Basin Gold Ltd. (TSX:GBG; AMEX:GBN)
21. Hawthorne Gold (TSX:HGC; OTC:HWTHF)
22. International Minerals Corp. (TSX:IMZ; OTC:IMZLF)
23. Jinshan Gold Mines Inc. (TSX:JIN; OTC:JINFF)
24. Kinbauri Gold (TSX:KNB; OTC:KINBF)
25. Lake Shore Gold Corp. (TSX:LSG; OTC:LSGGF)
26. La Mancha Res. (TSX:LMA; OTC :LACHF)
27. Luna Gold (TSX:LGC : OTC:LGCU)
28. Metanor Res. Inc. (TSX:MTO; OTC:MEAOF)
29. Minco Gold (TSX:MMM: AMEX:MGH)
30. Minefinders Corp. Ltd. (TSX:MFL; AMEX:MFN)
31. Moto Goldmines Ltd. (TSX:MGL; OTC:MTOGF)
32. Nevsun Resources Ltd. (TSX:NSU; AMEX:NSU)
33. New Guinea Gold (TSX: NGG: OTC:NGUGF)
34. NovaGold Resources Inc. (TSX:NG; AMEX:NG)
35. Orezone Resources Inc. (TSX:OZN; AMEX:OZN)
36. Pacific Rim Mining Corp. (TSX:PMU; AMEX:PMU)
37. Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (TSX:PTQ; OTC:PTQMF)
38. Rusoro Mining Ltd (TSX:RML; OTC:RMLFF)
39. San Gold Resources Corp. (TSX:SGR; OTC:SGRCF)
40. Starcore International (TSX:SAM: OTC:SHVLF))
41. Tara Gold (OTC:TRGD)
42. Timmins Gold Corp. (TSX:TMM; OTC:TMGOF)
43. Western Goldfields (TSX:WGI; AMEX:WGW)
Source: http://www.goldstockstrategist.com/search/label/Emerging%20Gold%20Producer%20List
In the two years since the list was compiled many names on this list have been acquired. Kinross has purchased Aurelian Resources in summer of 2008. Kinbauri Gold has been acquired by Orvana Minerals in August 2009. Anglogold Ashanti and Randgold fought off Redback Mining to takeover Moto Goldmines October 16, 2009. Lake Shore Gold and West Timmins Mining completed their business combination on November 6, 2009. The writer considers Great Basin Gold (GBG), #20 on this list as a star candidate that fits a typical takeover profile.
Recent Gold Acquisitions
Goldcorp acquires Canplats for $227Million USD
Goldcorp (GG) on November 16, 2009 announced their acquisition of Canplats Resources Corporation (CPQ, trading on the TSX Venture). Goldcorp will assume ownership of Canplats' Camino Rojo Project, located approximately 30 miles southeast of Goldcorp's existing Penasquito mine in Mexico. The deal valued at $227 USD Million will add 1.7 million ounces of reserves to Goldcorp’s resource base. The calculated value for this transaction is $133 USD per gold ounce of reserve for Canplat’s property.
Eldorado merger with Sino Gold valued at $1.8 Billion USD
Eldorado Gold (EGO) on August 2009 announced a friendly merger with Sino Gold that would create a $6.4 Billion dollar top mid tier gold miner. The deal values Sino Gold at $1.8 Billion USD. Sino Gold has their flagship Jinfeng mine and three smaller properties in China. This transaction is expected to close in December 2009. The value for this transaction is calculated to be $352 per gold ounce of reserve for Sino Gold’s mines.
Company Make Over
In another life the writer was consulting for a startup telecom technology company. There was much feverish work in the days prior to a team from Nortel coming to visit. Extra people such as I were brought in to round out the staffing. Empty crates were brought into the warehouse and stacked as if production was in high gear. Telecom test gear was brought in and setup in the labs so as to appear quite busy. Overall the company was given a quick makeover for the possible suitor. Eventually the telecom company was purchased by UT-Starcom.
Great Basin Gold as a Takeover Candidate
This writer completed a recent report on Great Basin Gold that is displayed on Seeking Alpha. Great Basin has two new mines that are just starting up production. Hollister in the Carlin Trend in Nevada is a high grade underground epithermal type deposit. Burnstone is a Kimberley Reef underground mine in the Witwatersrand Basin in South Africa. Great Basin shares a lot of similar attributes with Sino Gold, which was in the business combination with Eldorado Gold described earlier. A comparison of some key statistics are in the table following.
Great Basin Gold with Sino Gold Comparison
Table 2: Comparison of Great Basin Gold with Sino Gold. Note the similar production levels and Reserves and Resources.
Great Basin is very similar in size of operations to Sino Gold. The reserves and resources are similar sized and their projected production levels are closely matched.
Great Basin Gold (GBG) just completed an offering announced on November 1, 2009, $110 Million convertible debenture. As Ferdi Dippenaar, President and CEO, stated: “The sale of convertible debentures is the preferred option with fewer encumbrances on Great Basin Gold's balance sheet, no requirements to hedge gold production and, on a relative basis, comes at a lower cost of capital in a rising gold price environment.” Reading between the lines, this is code talk for cleaning financial house, in order to provide a neat and clean package for Big Gold’s consideration when they come calling.
Conclusion
The timing is right for Big Gold to bolster their depleting reserves. World markets are pushing the precious metal prices ever higher. Big Gold is flush with the high valuation of their stock prices. Their mined out reserves need to be replaced. Their own exploration will not be able to replenish the stock of minable ore bodies. The Big Gold companies are opening their Gold pouches and have their financial minions furiously calculating Gold Junior companies’ valuations. The bull market for precious metals has created a window of opportunity for astute investors. There are large and quick gains to be had, if you can find the right companies that are being targeted by Big Gold.
One company that is a target and favored by the writer is Great Basin Gold (GBG). Goldcorp established a benchmark of $133USD per Gold reserve ounce in their acquisition of Canplats. This was for Gold reserves on a property that only has a Preliminary Assessment completed for a possible open pit mine. Great Basin’s 5.3 Million ounces of reserves are in two ready to go mines that has infrastructure built with $334 Million in capital expenditures. Using the same valuation figure of $133 USD per reserve ounce times 5.3 Million reserve ounces gives $704 Million USD in value. Adding the $334 Million in mine infrastructure expenditures, the total becomes $1038 Million USD for the valuation of Great Basin. The current fully diluted shares outstanding is 437 million. Great Basin’s current stock price is $1.57 giving a market capitalization of $686 Million USD fully diluted. That means there is a possible 50% upside for Great Basin’s shares in this scenario.
For a second scenario, from Table 1, Great Basin is comparable with Sino Gold in valuation metrics. Should a business proposal appear, for valuation purposes, one may consider the $1.8 Billion valuation of Sino Gold as being applicable to Great Basin. If one considers the current debentures increasing the share float to 500 million, then the value per share would work out to be $3.60. Again there is a significant 100% + upside for Great Basin’s shares in this second scenario.
So Gold Junior, get your financial house in order, the “Gold Sugar Daddy” is coming!
Disclosure: The writer holds a long position in Great Basin Gold (GBG)
Marco G. November 22, 2009 http://goombarhsedge.blogspot.com/
Important Disclosure
The information and opinions contained within this document reflect the personal opinions and views of the author and should be view as information for thought and entertainment only. The author may from time to time have a position in any of the securities mentioned. Any material within should not be construed as accurate or reliable or be utilized as advice for investment or business purposes. Independent due diligence and discussions with one’s own investment and business advisor is strongly recommended. There are no guarantees of the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. These writing are not to be construed as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or as an endorsement of any product or service. We do not receive or request compensation in any form in order to feature companies in this publication. It is prohibited to copy or redistribute this document to any type of third party without the express permission of the author. This document may be quoted, in context, provided proper credit is given.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Introduction
In the Gold mining world as in life, Darwin’s law of survival of the fittest holds true. The large Gold mining companies (which we shall refer to as “Big Gold” hereinafter) need to continue growth in order to survive. Big Gold needs to replace their mined out resources in order to continue their existence and to grow.
Bull Market for Precious Metals
The up trend for the precious metals has accelerated recently with a spat of supportive news. In September 2009, the gold bugs were buzzing with the news that China was pushing their citizens to invest in precious metals as detailed here. Then on November 4th, 2009, the Indian central bank reveals a surprise purchase of 250 metric tons of Gold bullion from the International Monetary Fund as related here. Finally on November 12, 2009 in Vietnam, which had restricted imports of Gold in mid 2008, the local price had climbed to a $60 premium from the global spot price, before the government relented. All these events are indicators that the marketplace fervour for Gold is hot and getting hotter. It is interesting that these events are all happening on the Asian side of the world, but that is another tale to be told at another time.
These events are a few of the drivers behind the precious metal prices climbing higher. Supported by the rising gold price, the valuations of the Big Gold companies are rising close to their record highs. The time draws nigh for Big Gold to make some moves, armed with the valuations of their stock price.
Gold Production Reduces Reserves
For the average investor, it is a little known fact that acquisitions for Big Gold are a way of life. As the mines of the Big Gold companies extract the gold from the ground, the reserves or amount left to be mine, has to be replenished. For example, the world’s largest gold miner, Barrick (ABX), extracted 7.8 Million ounces of the precious metal in 2008. This is a very large figure, and for an idea of the size, this could represent 7 smaller gold companies, each with 1 million ounces of Gold reserves each. For the Big Gold companies the task of replenishing their mined reserves, is a lot more difficult than you can imagine.
Depleting Resources
As Big Gold extracts the gold from their mines, they need to replace them with an equivalent amount in reserves. In order to maintain the support of their investor public, Big Gold needs new reserves to shore up their financial ratios such as their market capitalization per gold reserve ounce. This need drives the Big Gold companies in their search for acquisition of smaller rivals with good reserve ounces in order to add the numbers back into their balance sheet.
Peak Gold
Similar to the idea of “Peak Oil”, there is a slow realization of “Peak Gold”. Worldwide production of the precious metal has been on a downtrend since 2003 as described by analyst Scott Wright. Some factors driving this downtrend are the depletion of resources at existing mines, mining production expenses climbing higher and just plain expensive access to new mining resources. The low-hanging fruit of easily discovered, easily accessible and low cost mines are gone. See the chart below for the graphic display of the trend downwards.
Figure 1: Global Gold Production in Downtrend. Note the peak in 2003 and the trend downwards since. Source: www.ZealLLC.com
Other factors such as mine operating expenses have climbed drastically. Eskom, the South African power utility have announced a 150% price increase in electricity for South African mines. The Gold companies reactions are the closure of their uneconomic mines. For example, Harmony just announced the planned closure of some of their high cost and low productivity mines.
Just on November 16th 2009, a research scientist announced the startling finding that 90% of South Africa’s Gold reserves, just are not available for mining. The president of Barrick Gold, Aaron Regent, the world’s largest producer, publicly stated on November 11, 2009 "There is a strong case to be made that we are already at 'peak gold. Production peaked around 2000 and it has been in decline ever since, and we forecast that decline to continue. It is increasingly difficult to find ore.
Gold Exploration
Big Gold companies are not the right organizations to discover new prospective mines. They are too large and too focused on production details just to keep their investors happy. The job of finding new gold deposits is best left to the small and nimble junior exploration companies. The acquisition of newly discovered and profitably mined deposits is a much better and lower risk route for the Big Gold companies.
The Big Gold Suitors
Following is a table listing of an odd bakers dozen of the world’s largest pure precious metal miners ranked by market capitalization. They are valued by the share price as of November 20, 2009.
Table 1: Largest Gold Miners in the World. They are listed by Market Capitalization. Note Newmont does not give Resources information.
This table of the largest Gold miners in the world is quite an eclectic collection as the valuations given by the markets are not directly attributable to a standardized metric, it is merely a snapshot at a particular time in an irrational marketplace. Note the relative high valuations for Goldcorp and Agnico-Eagle for their mines in politically safe Western hemisphere jurisdictions. Note also, the penalties given for Gold Fields and Harmony for their expensive mines in risky South Africa.
The most pressured Big Gold companies are those that have high production numbers that they need to replace in their reserves. From this listing, one conclusion that may be drawn is that the most driven suitors are the three Big Gold companies of Barrick (ABX), Goldcorp (GG) and Newmont (NEM). A fourth company is Kinross (KGC), which has a history of multiple acquisitions for growth.
The Magic of Accretive Ounces
On November 16, 2009, Goldcorp announced a friendly acquisition, “Goldcorp buys Canplats for $238-million”. The main target of the buyout was Canplats’ Camino Rojo Gold project, which is only 30 miles southeast of Goldcorp’s Penasquito mine in Mexico. Analyzing this simplistically by only considering the Gold reserve ounces available, the $227 Million USD is paying for 1.7 Million ounces of gold reserves (ignoring the inferred resources), which works out to $133 USD per ounce.
Then with the magic of accretive values, Goldcorp is valued at a market capitalization of $32 Billion based upon the 46 million ounces of reserves that it owns, which works out to $695 USD per Gold reserve ounce. Goldcorp just purchased Gold reserve ounces at $133 USD each and by just owning them, they become worth over five times more! Granted there are more variables to the calculations such as Silver resources and capital costs to bring the mine to fruition. However, the main point is that the reserve ounces belonging to Canplats are worth five times more in Goldcorp’s pocket.
Acquisition Frenzy Coming
Fortunately for the Big Gold companies the timing is just right presently, as the recent precious metals bull market has endowed Big Gold with a hefty war chest. So armed by their soaring stock price, the Big Gold Walruses are going shopping for Junior Gold Oysters.
“The time has come,” the Walrus said, “To talk of many things … Now if you're ready, Junior dear, We can begin to feed.” *
* apologies to Lewis Carroll, “Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There”, 1872
Disclosure: The writer does not hold any positions in Barrick (ABX), Goldcorp (GG), Newmont (NEM) or Kinross (KGC).
Marco G. November 15, 2009 http://goombarhsedge.blogspot.com/
Important Disclosure
The information and opinions contained within this document reflect the personal opinions and views of the author and should be view as information for thought and entertainment only. The author may from time to time have a position in any of the securities mentioned. Any material within should not be construed as accurate or reliable or be utilized as advice for investment or business purposes. Independent due diligence and discussions with one’s own investment and business advisor is strongly recommended. There are no guarantees of the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. These writing are not to be construed as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or as an endorsement of any product or service. We do not receive or request compensation in any form in order to feature companies in this publication. It is prohibited to copy or redistribute this document to any type of third party without the express permission of the author. This document may be quoted, in context, provided proper credit is given.
Friday, November 20, 2009
Introduction
The writer being always interested in Natural Gas was watching with amazement as the pricing of this commodity tumbled over the course of 2008 to 2009. See the following chart for the precipitous drop:
Figure 1: Natural Gas Pricing in Past 3 Years. Note the drop from the peak of $13.69 in July 2008. Also note the sharp price reversal that started in September 2009. Source: http://www.stockcharts.com/.
In the above chart, notice the highs in Summer of 2008 of $13 for Natural Gas. The chart shows the New York Merchantile Exchange (NYMEX) spot pricing at the Henry Hub in Louisiana. Approximately 50% of the US consumption passes close by to this centralized distribution point, so the pricing here sets a standard price for trading markets. The Natural Gas spot price slid uninterrupted until March 2009, when I started watching. Then the price churned sideways in Spring and Summer of 2009. From my tediousness in watching the churning, the writer missed the start of the run up at the beginning of September 2009. This trend reversion appeared to be part of the Gold, metals and commodities bull push up that began this fall at the beginning of September.
Then recently, on November 18, 2009, the writer caught the article by Sol Palha describing how Natural Gas may make a good long term play and I decided to capitalized upon this trend.
Situation Analysis
New Sources of Supply
Natural gas pricing is burdened with the tales of new discoveries of Natural Gas in shale rock formations. The stories relate that supplies with this new technology of sideways drilling will supply vast amounts of the neglected energy fuel for decades into the future. Also, there are other unconventional sources that new technology is bringing to the forefront such as Deep Natural Gas, Tight Natural Gas, Coal Bed Methane, Methane Hydrates and Geopressurized Zones. For a primer on these new sources see this Natural Gas Organization link.
Analysts are divided about the cheap gas potentials. At the Peak Oil Conference in Denver on October 13th, 2009, Energy Analyst Randy Udall stated, “The U.S. gas production peaked 35 years ago, and the roughly 10 percent jump in production over the last four years required doubling the drilling rate.”
Whatever the case may be, the writer believes the markets have already priced in all the theories of Natural Gas boom or bust into the pricing.
Economic Support for Higher Pricing
Though there is still wide spread concern about the robustness of the economic recovery and criticism about the recovery without jobs, the stock markets have clearly made a strong move up from March of 2009.
A leading indicator for the recovery is the pricing performance of the commodities upon which the economy is based. Examining the Continuous Commodities Index (CCI) gives one a good proxy for the leading edge of the economy’s behaviour as the index is composed of 19 raw materials used in industry. See the chart below for the calamitous drop of the CCI index in Summer of 2008 and the slow climb back this year.
Figure 2: The Commodities Research Bureau (CRB) Continuous Commodity Index (CCI) of 19 key commodities. Note the peak in July 2008, similar to Natural Gas (Natural Gas is 6% of this Index). Note that recovery for CCI started in December of 2008, while Natural Gas waited for Fall of 2009 to make any moves.
Comparing the Natural Gas NYMEX price chart to the above CCI chart, we see that the Commodities led the way, and that Natural Gas only started to move this Fall. This may stand to reason, as gas demand is cyclical annually and the demand season is just beginning to start with the onset of winter.
For further confirmation of the economy recovering, we examine the Baltic Dry Index. This is a shipping price index out of London, England which tracks the cost of international shipping of bulk cargoes. This is the follow on to the CCI as the cost of delivery of the commodities to the end users. The chart of the Baltic Dry Index below shows a bottom at the end of September 2009, with a sharp rise into October and November.
Figure 3: Baltic Dry Index of Shipping Costs. Note the bottom set at the end of September and the sharp rise into October and November.
From the commodities pricing behaviour and the rise in the Baltic Dry Index, the writer concludes that there are good supports for the idea that the recession has ended and that the recovery is on the way.
Annual Cycles for Domestic Natural Gas
Historically the gas prices are higher during the winter heating season as shown on the chart below.
Figure 4: NYMEX Natural Gas Price - 12 previous months. Note the Winter and Summer Pricing Cycles. Source: http://www.oilnergy.com/1gnymex.htm#year
The US Natural Gas distribution authorities purchase and store the gas underground in the Summer months and withdraw the gas for usage in the Winter months. The date for stopping the injection storage and for starting withdrawals for sales is creeping up on us; the start date may be during the week of November 23rd, 2009, dependent upon the weather. This annual pricing cycle for the winter heating season just adds further confidence to the trend reversal.
Natural Gas Bottoming and Trend Reversal
From the chart displayed in Figure 1, the Natural Gas price bottom was hit on September 4th , 2009at $2.62 and a sharp reversal happened. The price rocketed up to $5.83, reached on October 21st, 2009. Since then the price has eased off, settling just about the $4.50 range, presently.
This writer actively seeks value situations where a trend bottoms and a reversal is due. For Natural Gas, the bottom may have been reached in September already, and this November correction is merely a small pullback before a resumption in the up trend. This previous bottom, in the writer’s opinion makes the risks smaller, as the bottom has already been placed for Natural Gas.
For a second opinion, here is an interview with Robert Cooper, Acumen Captital Finance Partner, captured by Arjun Rudra, another Seeking Alpha contributor titled, “Cooper, Turnaround Happening for Natural Gas”.
Playing the Trend
There are many ways to play this trend. The Natural Gas industry has been battered by the year long slide in the commodity price, and one can pick through the litter for value. The writer is partial to large pipeline companies such as Enbridge (ENB) and Kinder Morgan (KMP), though they encompass more than just natural gas.
For further background and understanding about Natural Gas, a good Triology about Natural Gas was written by Joseph L. Shaefer, starting with “Natural Gas: America’s Energy Salvation”. For a discussion on the merits of some Natural Gas companies see “The Nine Best Natural Gas Oil Pipelines” and three top Natural Gas stocks “ Natural Gas Stocks: The Ultimate Form of Stored Solar Energy”.
Other methods of reaping gains in natural gas prices would be tracking ETFs. The most popular ETF, the United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) has swelled their assets to over $4 Billion and causing distortions in the markets. UNG has also encountered issues with costs involved in rolling over their futures contracts. Here is a Seeking Alpha article by Lara Crigger explaining the differences between UNG and UNL, the newly launched ETF version intended to spread out the Natural Gas futures rollovers. Finally here is a guide to Natural Gas ETFs.
Leveraging the Trend for the Risk Amenable
Since the writer has a certain degree of confidence in the analysis and the possible U-turn coming, he is looking to maximize the possible gain. There is a leveraged two times fund named the Horizons BetaPro NYMEX Natural Gas Bull Plus ETF (HNU in Canada and HNUzf in the US) managed by Horizons BetaPro Exchange Traded Funds. As described by their originator:
“The HBP Bull+ ETFs and HBP Bear+ ETFs are designed to provide daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to double the daily performance, or double the inverse daily performance, respectively, of their specified underlying index or benchmark.”
The writer’s understanding of leveraged ETF’s is that the fund should perform satisfactorily if the trend is right, and moves directionally without much churning. The costs generated daily during the price churning will eat away at the gains. Also during a counter movement, the potential exists for a doubling of the leverage during the counter move, and thereby losses may be more than doubled.
Therefore, a heavy note of caution here is warranted as leveraged ETF’s are risky and come with a whole slew of these issues such as tracking errors, significantly higher expenses and daily returns not long term returns. Here is an older Seeking Alpha article detailing “The Case Against Leveraged ETFs”.
The HNU fund only tracks the domestic NYMEX spot price at the Henry Hub location. This limits the effects of other drivers of natural gas pricing and concentrates solely upon the supply and demand equation at the distribution point. See the chart following for the recent price action of the HNU ETF.
Figure 5: Horizons BetaPro NYMEX Natural Gas Bull Plus ETF. Note the Dolji at the end. Source http://www.incrediblecharts.com/
From examining the above chart, the bottom for HNU appears to be firming up with the two blue days ending on November 20, 2009.
Conclusion
The general economic climate is in the beginning stages of recovery. The recovery in commodities prices and the Dry Baltic shipping index gives support to the idea of recovery. Natural Gas pricing fell with everything else and was slower to recover having being impacted with a glut of new supplies and the summer season of lower demand. The bottom for Natural Gas prices was already set in September, 2009. Now that winter is looming, the seasonal demand and price adjustments should soon be having an impact. Whether the pricing moves up this week or later, the trend should be upwards for Natural Gas from here.
The writer holds a long position in HNU.
Marco G. November 20, 2009 http://goombarhsedge.blogspot.com/
Important Disclosure
The information and opinions contained within this document reflect the personal opinions and views of the author and should be view as information for thought and entertainment only. The author may from time to time have a position in any of the securities mentioned. Any material within should not be construed as accurate or reliable or be utilized as advice for investment or business purposes. Independent due diligence and discussions with one’s own investment and business advisor is strongly recommended. There are no guarantees of the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. These writing are not to be construed as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or as an endorsement of any product or service. We do not receive or request compensation in any form in order to feature companies in this publication. It is prohibited to copy or redistribute this document to any type of third party without the express permission of the author. This document may be quoted, in context, provided proper credit is given.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Silver: Leverage the Laggard
Figure 1: Fall 2009 Chart of Gold Miners and Gold. Note that the resistance level once broken decisively turns into support. Source: http://www.stockcharts.com/
Figure 2: Silver Price Chart Fall 2009. Note the double test of the $16 level which is now the new Floor support price for Silver. Source: www.stockcarts.com
Gold Silver Ratio
There exists a methodology of comparison between the two siblings, a loose standard called the “Gold Silver Ratio”. The historic ratio over history may be thought of as 15 to 1. That is a millennium long ratio that compares the relative value of the two metals over history. For the recent history of this ratio see the Gold Silver Ratio comparison chart below.
Figure 3: Chart for the last 3 years of the Gold to Silver Ratio. Note the dramatic spike in October 2008 and the gradual descent of the ratio for this year, 2009. Source: http://www.stockcharts.com/
The present ratio value is about 65, that is the $1100 Gold price compared to the $17 Silver price. This shows that Silver is presently an extreme laggard to the leader Gold. The ratio spiked in October 2008 with the rush to safety in Gold driving the price high. This chart is telling us that the ratio is settling down and should come back to a more natural ratio of the 50 range in the near term. The author submits that there is a tendency in all natural systems for a revision to mean; that is the pendulum swings both ways, what goes up should in time come back to normal. That is unless there are fundamental structural basic changes that cause a new normal such as what we have touched upon for the precious metal bull market.
Silver Target price
With a precious metal up trend unfolding, what should be a reasonable target for Gold’s sibling Silver? This author sees evidence of a precious metal bull market happening, but he cannot predict the outcome or target price. Fortunately, the author in researching for this article came across a Point and Figure chart prediction, reproduced below.
Figure 4: Point & Figure Chart that filters out the noise; note the Target of $26. Source: http://www.stockcharts.com/
The algorithms driving the above charting of the Silver price data came up with a price objective of $26. This seems reasonable to me.
With the understanding of the precious metal trend, of the underlying floor price, of the tendency of revision to mean and a target price, there appears to be an opportunity here. The indicators are all pointing to a drastic increase in the price of Silver.
Silver is more volatile than Gold and may go beyond our projections, but that is a topic for another day. Note that the historic ratio of Gold to Silver is15, which calculates to give a price of $73 presently should the ratio linkage be valid.
Leverage with Stocks
With Silver at $17 and the projected increase to $26, that gives us a possible 50% gain by investing in the metal. Now, one may easily leverage that with investing in silver stocks. The short answer to why stocks leverage an underlying commodity price is that the increasing metal price increases the company profits while costs should stay about the same. A more comprehensive explanation of stock leverage over the commodity price by Mr. Greg McCoach is here: http://www.amerigold.com/investing/index.php?mod=cnt&act=cnt&id=23
Commonly accepted wisdom is that stocks provide two to three times the gains in the underlying metal price. There is the caveat of risk that should the metal prices slide, the downside for the stock price is also more severe.
The author is partial to silver stocks such as Hecla Mining (HL) and Silver Wheaton (SLW). Hecla is mainly a Silver producer that is continuing a turnaround in their operations. Hecla produces Silver from their Greens Creek mine in Alaska and Lucky Friday mine in Idaho. A bonus is the Gold production from Greens Creek. Here is a Seeking Alpha article describing the trials of Hecla: http://seekingalpha.com/article/119319-hecla-mining-caught-in-a-bad-market . Silver Wheaton is a royalty company leveraged to the Silver price. Silver Wheaton has only 26 employees and fifteen Silver royalty streams. Here is a link to a Seeking Alpha article that covers SLW: http://seekingalpha.com/article/172716-three-metal-miners-three-dynamic-business-models-three-great-quarters
Leverage with warrants
Another method for leverage is to use warrants that give rights to purchase an equity. There exists bullion funds that are traded similar to equities on the Toronto Stock Exchange TSX such as Silver Bullion Trust, SBT.un and Claymore Silver Bullion Trust, SVR.un. These two examples have warrants that also trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange TSX, SBT.wt and SVR.wt respectively. The particularly intriguing aspects of these warrants are firstly, they are in the money, that is the underlying security is above the exercise price. Secondly, the warrants are particularly good value, trading (as of November 13, 2009) at $1.30(Cdn) and $.87 (Cdn) respectively. Thirdly, the warrants give the right to purchase the equity at $10 (USD) and $12 (Cdn) respectively, which is a leverage of about 7 to 1. A note about risk with these warrants is that if not exercised by the expiry date they become worthless. The SVR.wt expires on January 15, 2010 and the SBT.wt expires on April 29, 2010.
Conclusion
These tactics are not without risk, and not something I would bet the house upon; however I have backed my deliberations with some dollars. The risk is having silver fall below the floor price that we have assumed. Then the investor is set up for a major loss; or if the investor still believes the story, then it will be a waiting game for the bull to come to fruition. Just remember the stock market is a “Great Humbler” and can be irrational for longer than people can withstand in their pocketbooks. So with the disclaimer out of the way, Hi-ho Silver and away!
The author is long the Silver Bullion Trust warrants, SBT.wt.
Important Disclosure
The information and opinions contained within this document reflect the personal opinions and views of the author and should be view as information for thought and entertainment only. The author may from time to time have a position in any of the securities mentioned. Any material within should not be construed as accurate or reliable or be utilized as advice for investment or business purposes. Independent due diligence and discussions with one’s own investment and business advisor is strongly recommended. There are no guarantees of the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. These writing are not to be construed as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or as an endorsement of any product or service. We do not receive or request compensation in any form in order to feature companies in this publication. It is prohibited to copy or redistribute this document to any type of third party without the express permission of the author. This document may be quoted, in context, provided proper credit is given.
Sunday, November 8, 2009
GBG –Jump to Mid-Tier Gold Producer!
GBG –Jump to Mid-Tier Gold Producer!
Introduction
Great Basin Gold is an emerging gold production company headquartered in Vancouver, Canada with operations in Nevada and South Africa. The company’s shares are listed on the TSX (GBG) in Canada, on the Amex (GBN) in the United States and on the JSE (GBG) in South Africa. The company is a focused developer with two new gold projects that are proceeding into mining. The Hollister mine is in the gold prolific area of the Carlin Trend in Nevada and the Burnstone mine is in Kimberly Reef area of the Witwatersrand Basin in South Africa. Great Basin Gold’s shares have been included in the Amex Gold Miners index (GDM) in the US and both the S&P/TSX Composite and S&P/TSX Small Cap Indexes in Canada.
GBG Projects
Hollister Mine – Nevada, USA
Hollister is a bonanza grade gold mine in Nevada that is just ramping up into production. The mine is based upon several high-grade epithermal gold-silver vein systems below the Tertiary cover. Bulk samples have been excavated and milled for validating and tuning up the production processes this year. Pre-production drilling has increased the mineral resource by 27% to 3 million Au equivalents as reported in June 30, 2009 M. D. & A[1]. The average grade of ore for the mine is over 1 ounce of Gold equivalents per ton mined.
Great Basin acquired the property in Elko County, Nevada from Newmont in 1997. Great Basin explored the property outlining excellent high grade veins until 2001. In 2002 Hecla entered into an earn-in and joint operating agreement with Great Basin to explore and bring the property into commercial production. In 2007 Great Basin purchased back the earn-in option from Hecla for $60 million US, thereby giving GBG 100% ownership of the project. At the time, a 6800 feet decline and 1000 feet of drifts through the veins had already been completed at the Hollister project.
Since 2007 Great Basin has completed a further 30,000 feet of underground development. A total of 26 discrete veins have been discovered including 2 new ones in 2009. Bulk samples have been excavated and treated at the nearby mills of Yukon Nevada’s Jerritt Canyon and Newmont’s Midas Mine. Subsequently in November 2008, Great Basin has purchased the Esmeralda Mine and accompanying mill. This mill is 280 miles distant from Hollister and the operating plan is to truck the Hollister ore there. The mill’s capacity is 350 tons per day, and management intends to modify the mill and upgrade the capacity.
Other than the Hollister mine and block (5% of the property), the property of about 27 square miles, also has many other gold prospects that have been and are currently being explored. The February 27, 2009 Technical Report states that “The greater Hollister claim block has significant exploration potential to host one or more additional high grade “bonanza” vein systems under the Tertiary volcanic cover.” Full production from Hollister is expected to produce 120 k ounces of Gold equivalents per year.
Burnstone Mine – Witwatersrand, South Africa
The newly developed Burnstone mine in the Witwatersrand basin in South Africa is the first new mine in the region for the last thirty years. The mine accesses the gold bearing Kimberly Reef at a relatively shallow depth of 300 to 500 meters. The target date for commissioning operations is June 30, 2010. The vertical shaft has reached the Kimberly Reef target at 360 meters and the access decline has also reached their targets for reef development. Presently, test mining is proceeding with the ore being stockpiled until the above ground infrastructure is ready.
In November 2002, Great Basin acquired the right to purchase 100% interest in the South African company Southgold Exploration (Pty) Ltd, which had the rights to the Burnstone Gold Property. The two-stage acquisition was completed in January 2004, giving Great Basin 100% ownership of the property. Tranter Investments a Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) company has invested in Burnstone, owning 26% which was then transferred to GBG, owning an estimated 15% of the company.
The Burnstone project is located in the Witwatersrand about 80 km southeast of the city of Johannesburg in South Africa. The project is situated close to paved highways, infrastructure, railroad and power lines. All of the required permits to complete the development of the mine and commence full scale underground mining have been obtained.
The Burnstone goldfield is defined by an 18 kilometer long, northwesterly trending mineralized corridor hosting the Kimberley Reef, one of four main gold-bearing units in the Witwatersrand Basin. At Burnstone, the central portion of the gold corridor has been uplifted by two northwesterly trending sub-parallel faults and as a result, a significant portion of the deposit areas along the trend occur at relatively shallow depths of 200-750 meters. Full production is expected to produce 250 k ounces of Gold per year
Quantitative Analysis
Gold Mineral Resources
Hollister Mine in Carlin Trend, Nevada USA – Reserves & Resources
Proven & Probable Au Equivalent Reserves
1,200,000 oz
Measured & Indicated Au Equivalent Resources
1,500,000 oz
Inferred Au Equivalent Resources
1,400,000 oz
Mine Life
10 years
Table 1: Hollister Mine - Reserves & Resources
Hollister Mineral Resource Estimate: March 2009
Resource Category
Cut-offoz/ton
Tons
Auoz/ton
ContainedAu oz²
Agoz/ton
ContainedAu Eq. oz
Measured
0.25
199,300
1.895
377,700
29.02
468,100
Indicated
0.25
911,900
1.008
918,700
4.13
977,500
Total Measured & Indicated
0.25
1,111,200
1.167
1,296,400
8.59
1,445,600
Inferred
0.25
1,035,300
1.340
1,387,500
2.72
1,431,500
Table 2: Hollister Mineral Resource Estimate
Burnstone Mine in Witwatersrand, South Africa– Reserves & Resources
Proven & Probable Au Equivalent Reserves
4,100,000 oz.
Measured & Indicated Au Equivalent Resources
10,900,000 oz.
Inferred Au Equivalent Resources
4,500,000 oz.
Mine Life
19 years
Table 3: Burnstone Mine - Reserves & Resources
Burnstone Mineral Resources Overall Property: October 2009
RESOURCECATEGORY
Cut-offcmg/t
Tonnesmillions
Au Gradeg/t
Contained AuOunces
Measured
400
43.9
6.08
8,569,500
Indicated
400
10.3
9.21
3,038,600
TOTAL MEASURED & INDICATED
400
54.1
6.67
11,608,100
Inferred
400
11.8
12.14
4,588,700
Table 4: Burnstone Mineral Resource Estimate
Estimated Gold Mining Production
Hollister Estimated Gold Production
2008 production
80 k Au Eq. oz.
Est. 2009 production
115 k Au Eq. oz.
Average annual production
120 k Au Eq. oz.
Average grade of ore extracted
49g/ton Au Eq. oz
Cash cost per oz. (USD)
$426
Total* costs per oz. (USD)
$559
Table 5: Hollister Estimated Production
Source: February 18, 2009 Hollister Technical Report by J. Oelofse, P. Bentley, and D. van der Heever[2]
*1 Total cost includes mineral taxes, federal income tax payable of US$78/oz, and depreciation and amortization US$55/oz on capital expenditure of $110 Million USD
Burnstone Estimated Gold Production
Average annual production
254 k Au Eq. oz.
Average grade of ore expected
4.3g /ton
Cash cost per oz. (USD)
$319
Total* costs per oz. (USD)
$495
Table 6: Burnstone Estimated Gold Production
Source: February 16, 2009 Burnstone Technical Report by D. van der Heever, J. Oelofse and P. Bentley[3]
* 1 Total cost includes mineral taxes, federal income tax payable of US$118/oz and depreciation and amortization of US$58/oz on capital expenditures of $224 Million USD
Stock Structure and Ownership
GBG Stock Structure and Price
Shares: Basic
334,000,000
Warrants
86,178,552
Options
17,559,599
Fully Diluted
438,000,000
Share Price (Oct 22, 2009)
Cdn $1.74
Market Cap – Basic (Oct 22, 2009)
Cdn $579,000,000
Fully Diluted
Cdn $762,000,000
Table 7: GBG Stock Structure and Price
GBG Ownership Information
Shares Outstanding
334,000,000
Institutional Ownership
44%
Top 10 Institutions
33%
Mutual Fund Ownership
13%
5%/Insider Ownership
1%
Float
99%
Table 8: GBG Ownership Information[4]
On October 29th, 2009, Great Basin announced a $110 Million bought deal public offering of convertible debentures[5]. This offering is set to close on November 17th, 2009. The purpose of the offering was to replace the Burnstone construction loans from the syndicate of banks. The newer financing is lower cost and more flexible without having to hedge any gold production from Burnstone.
Great Basin Gold Ownership of Properties
GBG Rusaf
Great Basin owns 100% of GBG Rusaf, formerly Rusaf Gold. The Company acquired Rusaf Gold Ltd. in April 2008. Rusaf holds interests in early stage mineral prospects, the Tsetsera Property in Mozambique, properties in Tanzania and Iturup (Kurils) Islands (Russian Federation).
In 2008 Russaf conducted exploration in three regional areas of Lake Victoria (North-West) early stage, Lupa (South-West) drilling at Nkolwisi, and Kikugwe (Central-South) soil sampling. Initial 43-101 reports are nearing completion. In 2008 Rusaf drilled 33 holes in the Kurils Islands. Analysis and initial technical documents are currently being completed for the Kurils project.
Kryso Resources
Great Basin holds a a 16.7% equity interest in Kryso Resources. Kryso is an AIM-listed mineral exploration and development company focused on projects in Tajikistan. Kryso’s primary goal is to bring the Pakrut gold project in Tajikistan, of which it has 100% ownership, into production. An internal prefeasibility study has been completed for the Pakrut project, with highly positive results, and a bankable feasibility study on a mining operation is currently underway.
Qualitative Analysis
Management
Chairman - Ronald W. Thiessen
Mr Thiessen is associated with Hunter Dickinson Services Inc., a company providing management and administrative services to several publicly-traded companies and focuses on directing corporate development and financing activities. He is also a director of Hunter Dickinson Services Inc.
Among R. Thiessen’s other executive positions held are as Chairman of Taseko Mines(TSX: TKO) and as President & CEO of Northern Dynasty Minerals (TSX: NDM), which is developing the massive Pebble Beach copper gold project in Alaska.
President & CEO - Ferdinand Dippenaar
Mr. Dippenaar is a recognized member of the South African mining industry where he has worked for 25 years. In 1996 he was managing director of Grootvlei and of East Rand Proprietary Mines. Harmony Gold purchased Grootvlei and he became marketing director of Harmony. Most recently he was the Executive Director of Marketing for Harmony, when he was appointed Director, President and CEO of Great Basin Gold Ltd. in December 2005.
Market Analysis
The Gold market has witnessed a strong recovery from the economic volatility of Fall 2008. Beginning in September, 2009 Gold started a strong uptrend and pierced the $1000 USD mark. Presently the Gold price is hovering between $1020 and $1060 USD.
Great Basin Gold undertook a massive $145 million financing in March of 2009. The financing was 115 million shares priced at $1.30 Canadian, each with one-half warrant priced at $1.60 and valid until October 15, 2010. This financing diluted the company stock by 46% and has left a significant overhang on the share price. The GBG stock has witnessed severe price volatility, rising and plunging from $1.20 to $1.70 all summer of 2009.
On October 29, 2009, Great Basin announced a $110 Million convertible debenture bought financing. This loan will pay back their existing construction loan facilities and they will not need the financing from the previously arranged syndication of banks.
As Great Basin takes positive steps in moving both mines into production the market should re-value the share price. Hollister with the Esmeralda mill is on the verge of full production. Burnstone is following the plan of commencing official production on June 30, 2010. With both mines producing, the planned annual output of GBG is around 350 k oz. of gold equivalents. This is from the Hollister cash cost of $426 per oz. and the Burnstone cash cost of $319 per oz. The cash flow will be robust and the profit margin will be very healthy if the price of Gold maintains above $1000 USD. Note that Great Basin has managed construction of the mines without hedging any of their future production. The future is very golden for Great Basin Gold as they maintain full leverage to the potential up trend in the gold price.
Exploration Potential
Hollister Exploration Potential
The Hollister area has excellent potential to host further high grade vein systems. The mine location is in the Carlin trend where they are surrounded by operating gold mines.
Above ground, there is the potential associated with the geologic cover (as reported in the June 30, 2009 M. D. & A[6]):
“Intersection of significant “Blanket-style” disseminated Au mineralization in the overlying Tertiary volcanics (HSD-64 31ft @ 0.78 opt / 9.3m @ 26.6 g/t Au)”
Drilling at the West Lateral location has already encountered intersections of 3 oz per ton over 2 feet as announce in their.
Reported on October 27, 2009[7]:
“Drilling in the Blanket Zone has indicated grade continuity in mineralization and a body of disseminated gold hosted in Tertiary volcanic rocks above the epithermal, banded veins. Intersections range in thickness from 19.4 to 135 ft (5.9 to 41.1 m) and grades between 0.130 to 0.500 opt (4.4 to 17.2 g/t) Au.”
The claim area around Hollister is large and prospective (as reported in the June 30, 2009 M. D. & A):
“The integration of previous geophysical surveys (airborne magnetics, radiometrics, and ground Induced Polarisation and CSMAT resistivity surveys) with available geological and drilling data has continued. Follow-up targets of preserved mineral systems similar to Hollister that exist on the claims block are being prioritized.”
At the previous operating Esmeralda mine, there is potential to restart mining quickly where there are existing stope developments giving access to the high grade ore.
Also the GBG geologic review of Esmeralda has determined that the fault structural control is the most important indicator of deposit mineralization (as reported in the June 30, 2009 M. D. & A):
A property wide geological assessment has indicated significant untested down faulted epithermal vein targets immediately east of previous opencast and underground operations.
Burnstone Increase in Reserves
Development of this exciting project continues in line with plan and is on track for commissioning by end of June 2010. Another exciting aspect is the commencement of trial mining to determine optimal mining methods which gets underway during October 2009. The current mining plan has assumed the mining of only 4.1 million ounces of the 12.5 million ounces of the resource. The positive results from the ongoing surface and now underground exploration programs continue to add resource ounces which could positively impact on the future development and production profile in the Burnstone region.[8]
Upside Potential
Great Basin as an Acquisition Target Scenario
Great Basin boasts 14 million ounces of gold in reserves and measured and indicated categories. In this environment of $1000 gold price and depleting reserves for the top tier gold miners, Great Basin makes for an attractive acquisition target with their new mines and ample resource ounces. The prevailing price paid per gold ounce for acquisitions is about $125. Multiplying $125 per ounce by 14 million ounces gives a possible price of $1750 million for Great Basin. $1750 million divided by 460 million shares fully diluted gives us a share price of $3.80 for a possible buyout. The share price for today, November 6, 2009, is $1.60 which gives us a possible 137% gain for buyout.
Great Basin’s Share Price Versus Gold Sales
Great Basin in 2010 at full production should be producing about to 380 k ounces of gold equivalents per annum. With gold at $1000 per ounce, that production will come to $380 million USD in sales. Top tier gold miners are valued at about 10 times gold sales. If we use 5 times valuation for being mid-tier, that valuation of Great Basin works out to be $1900 million. $1900 million divided by 570 million shares (including the convertible debentures), gives a share price of $3.33. That is a 108% gain from the price of $1.60 today.
With a disciplined management, Great Basin looks capable of achieving the upside targets for shareholders.
Current Status*
Hollister Property
• Increase to 1.5 million Au equivalent ounces in measured and indicated categories and 1.4 million Au equivalent ounces in the inferred category1.
• 18,026 Au equivalent ounces extracted by trial mining during the quarter and 60,554 Au equivalent ounces extracted for the year to date.
• 14% decrease quarter-on-quarter in cash production cost per Au equivalent ounce to US$324.
• Further positive results received from underground infill drilling program confirming planned stope grades.
• Permit obtained from the BLM to construct west Alimak raise.
Burnstone Property
• Increase to 11.6 million Au ounces in measured and indicated categories and to 4.6 million Au ounces in inferred category2.
• 1,439 ft (436 m) of on-reef development to date.
• Foundation for metallurgical plant completed and civil works commenced.
• Depth of 1,188 ft (408 m) below surface reached on vertical shaft with 435 ft (85 m) remaining to shaft bottom and 716 ft (217 m) of station development completed on 40 Level at October 28, 2009.
Esmeralda Property
• Successful refurbishment and commissioning of mill on September 9, 2009.
• Completion of desk top due diligence study on underground mining potential.
* Source: Management's Discussion And Analysis Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 posted November 6, 2009 on www.sedar.com[9]
Summary & Recommendation
The economics of Great Basin’s Hollister and Burnstone mines are robust yet conservative. The company is a relatively low cost producer with cash production costs per ounce of $426 for Hollister and $319 for Burnstone. The all in costs (including taxes, depreciation and amortization) per ounce are estimated at $559 for Hollister and $495 for Burnstone.
The new Hollister mine in Nevada is already producing ore in trial mining. Estimated production for 2009 is 115,000 gold equivalent ounces. Development drilling is reporting and confirming the high grades to be mined. The commissioning of the Esmeralda mill for the Hollister ore was successful.
The Hollister pre-production work has also increased the resources by 27%. Drilling prospective areas around the mine have discovered two new veins as well as finding long lengths of mineralization in the overlying Tertiary volcanic ground cover above the veins. The Hollister claim area is considered extremely prospective for further economic mineralization.
The economics of the new Burnstone mine in the Witwatersrand compares favorably with the South African industry averages. The planned average grade to be mined is 4.3 g/ton compared with the South African industry average of 3.4g/ton. The cash cost margin of Burnstone is 60% compared to 30% average for the South African industry. The decline and shaft are in place with trial mining and stockpiling for the ore. The target date for production is June 30, 2010.
Great Basin announced on October 13th, 2009, an increase to Burnstone’s substantial resource. The current Burnstone mining plan is based on only 4.1 mm oz. of the 11.5 mm oz. Measured & Indicated resource base. There is a further 4.6 mm oz. of the inferred category in the mine area. Surface and underground exploration in the area is continuing and will likely add to the reserves and resources.
Great Basin has a critical trait for success, a management track record of delivering on their projections. Great Basin reported aggressive cost management of the Hollister project and improvements in the mining dilution and methods have reduced their costs from plan[10].
Obviously, the previous management relationship with the renowned mine managerial firm of Hunter Dickenson shows in the disciplined and competent nature of their operations.
The outlook for Great Basin’s share price to rise as they enter full production is positive. As examined in two upside scenarios of acquisition or price to sales the possible upside for GBG shares is at least 100%. The time frame for these scenarios to unfold is short, possibly within a year.
Great Basin offers a unique blend of a new low cost sustainable long life mine in South Africa combined with a cash cow of a bonanza epithermal mine in Nevada. The writer after examining the available information, has come to this favorable conclusion. Great Basin will soon transform from a mine developer in 2009 and will jump immediately into a mid-tier gold producer status in 2010. This is in the midst of a solid up trend in precious metal pricing. For the astute investor, this transformation will result in a significant re-rating of Great Basin Gold’s share price.
References
[1] Great Basin Gold, “Management's Discussion And Analysis Quarter Ended June 30, 2009”, August 18, 2009, [Cited November 6, 2009], available from http://www.sedar.com/
[2] Great Basin Gold, “ GBG Hollister Technical Report”, February 27, 2009, [Cited November 6, 2009], available from http://www.greatbasingold.com/simple/operations/f/GBG-Hollister-tech-report-revised-27Feb2009.pdf
[3] Great Basin Gold, “ GBG Burnstone Technical Report”, February 27, 2009, [Cited November 6, 2009], available from http://www.greatbasingold.com/simple/operations/f/GBG-Burnstone-tech-report-revised-27Feb2009.pdf
[4] GBG – Great Basin Gold, “Institutional Ownership Information”, [Cited November 6, 2009], available from http://moneycentral.msn.com/ownership?Holding=Institutional+Ownership&Symbol=CA%3AGBG
[5] Great Basin Gold, “Great Basin Gold Announces C$110 Million Bought Deal Public Offering of Convertible Debentures”, October 29, 2009, [Cited November 6, 2009], available from http://www.greatbasingold.com/index.html?lf=1;pcat=2009;pg=25;ai=1290
[6] Great Basin Gold, “Management's Discussion And Analysis Quarter Ended June 30, 2009”, August 18, 2009, [Cited November 6, 2009], available from http://www.sedar.com/
[7] Great Basin Gold, “Great Basin Gold Provides Hollister Exploration Results And Operational Update”, Stockhouse.com, October 27, 2009, [Cited November 6, 2009], available from http://www.stockhouse.com/News/CanadianReleasesDetail.aspx?n=7503922
[8] Great Basin Gold, “Great Basin Gold Provides Hollister Exploration Results And Operational Update”, Stockhouse.com, October 27, 2009, [Cited November 6, 2009], available from http://www.stockhouse.com/News/CanadianReleasesDetail.aspx?n=7503922
[9] Great Basin Gold, “Management's Discussion And Analysis Quarter Ended September 30, 2009” , November 6, 2009, [Cited November 8, 2009], available from http://www.sedar.com/
Important Disclosure
The information and opinions contained within this document reflect the personal opinions and views of the author and should be view as information for entertainment only. The author may from time to time have a position in any of the securities mentioned. Any material within should not be construed as accurate or reliable or be utilized as advice for investment or business purposes. Independent due diligence and discussions with one’s own investment and business advisor is strongly recommended. There are no guarantees of the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. These writing are not to be construed as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or as an endorsement of any product or service. We do not receive or request compensation in any form in order to feature companies in this publication. It is prohibited to copy or redistribute this document to any type of third party without the express permission of the author. This document may be quoted, in context, provided proper credit is given.